Claims

The experimental group improved most in the point of view aspect, rising from a mean of 6.06 to 7.50

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's largest gain was in point of view (mean 6.06 to 7.50), followed in descending order by unity and coherence, development, organization and thinking; the article reports a Partial Eta Squared of 0.024. → Al-Shaer 2014

Evidence

Al-Shaer 2014

Al-Shaer, Ibrahim M. R. Ph.D. (2014). Employing Concept Mapping as a Pre-writing Strategy to Help EFL Learners Better Generate Argumentative Compositions. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080210

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive comparison of pre- and post-test means from Table (3) with a reported Partial Eta Squared of 0.024. The article's interpretation of the eta-squared value is vague; the descriptive means are reported as printed.

"the experimental improved most in the point of view aspect in which their mean score increased from 6.06 in the pre-test to 7.50 in the post-test, followed in descending order by unity and coherence, development, organization and thinking. In addition, the Partial Eta Squared was 0.024, which means that there are differences in the mean groups."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.