Claims

The control group receiving textbook-only instruction showed no significant pre-to-post differences on any of the five writing aspects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Paired t-tests on the control group's pre-test versus post-test scores indicated no significant differences on point of view (0.701), unity and coherence (0.832), development (0.747), organization (0.193), and thinking (0.652); the overall p-value was 0.565. → Al-Shaer 2014

Evidence

Al-Shaer 2014

Al-Shaer, Ibrahim M. R. Ph.D. (2014). Employing Concept Mapping as a Pre-writing Strategy to Help EFL Learners Better Generate Argumentative Compositions. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2014.080210

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Paired t-test reported in Table (4) for the 19-student control group, which received textbook instruction only. No effect size is printed for this null finding; equivalence was not tested.

"a paired t-test performed on the mean scores of the pre-test versus the post-test for the control group indicates no significant differences regarding the five aspects of essay writing: point of view (0.701), unity and coherence (0.832), development (0.747), organization (0.193), and thinking (0.652). The overall p-value was 0.565."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.