Existing AI × SEL policy claims concentrate at macro and meso levels, with almost none at the classroom level¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Of 31 identified policy implication claims, 16 target the macro level, 14 the meso level, and only one the micro level of classroom pedagogical practice. → Tran Van Cuong 2026

Evidence¶

Tran Van Cuong 2026¶

Tran Van Cuong, Liu Yihan, Nguyen Van Tuong. (2026). The Policy Deficit in AI x Social-Emotional Learning Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29950 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.29950

q2 · i? · review · r2

Qualitative WH-framework coding of the 31 implication narratives extracted from the 18 papers with policy content. The review reports "16 implications target the macro -level of policy", 14 meso-level claims, and only one micro-level claim (Jafari et al., 2026).

"16 implications target the macro -level of policy."

Tran Van Cuong 2026 (2)¶

Tran Van Cuong, Liu Yihan, Nguyen Van Tuong. (2026). The Policy Deficit in AI x Social-Emotional Learning Research. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.29950

q2 · i? · review · r2

Same coding exercise: the review reports "14 claims out of 31 claims are implications at the meso level", emphasizing institutional integration, school culture, teacher training, and flexible resource allocation.

"14 claims out of 31 claims are implications at the meso level."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Digital transformation permeates all levels of the education system as an interdependent structure — related
• Directly prompted Claude 3.7 macro-level deep feedback was judged effective for 93.03% of 201 paragraph-level comments — related
• Directly prompted Claude 3.7 micro-level deep feedback was judged both necessary and effective in 94.69% of 630 comments — related