Combined pre-task and on-line planners achieved significantly more fluent speech than on-line-only planners¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Among experimental groups, POLP planners' post-test speech was significantly more fluent than OLP planners' (p=.021), while the difference from PTP planners was not significant. → Seifoori 2016

Evidence¶

Seifoori 2016¶

Seifoori, Z. (2016). Metacognitive awareness and the fluency of task-based oral output across planning conditions: The case of Iranian TEFL students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 11-26. https://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr

q3 · i? · causal · r2

One-way ANOVA on post-test fluency of the 58 experimental participants was significant (F=4.15, p=.02), followed by a Tukey post-hoc test. "the POLP planners speech was significantly more fluent compared to OLP planners"; POLP (.26) vs PTP (.40) was not significant.

"the POLP planners speech was significantly more fluent compared to OLP planners with an average of.45, p=.021<.05"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Control-group combined planners also improved fluency, attributed to double planning time — related
• A metacognitive awareness-raising program improves the repair fluency of TEFL students' task-based oral output — related
• The fluency workshop did not increase trimmed speech rate significantly more than a general English class, though the experimental group alone showed a significant pre-to-post increase — related