Claims

Control-group combined planners also improved fluency, attributed to double planning time

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Among control participants, only the POLP planners showed a substantial decline in dyfluency from pre-test (.81) to post-test (.34). → Seifoori 2016

Evidence

Seifoori 2016

Seifoori, Z. (2016). Metacognitive awareness and the fluency of task-based oral output across planning conditions: The case of Iranian TEFL students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 11-26. https://www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive comparison of pre- and post-test means for the 20 control POLP planners in Table 2 and Figure 2. "the dyfluency of whose speech declined drastically from .81 on the pre-test to .34 on the post-test"; the author links this to double planning time.

"the dyfluency of whose speech declined drastically from .81 on the pre-test to .34 on the post-test, might be associated with the double planning time they had for pre-task and on-line planning"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.