Claims

Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, less metacognitively accurate, and overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated and less metacognitively accurate than well-performing peers. → Desoete 2019 q3 i? Poor mathematics performers overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades. → Desoete 2019

Evidence

Desoete 2019

Desoete, A., Baten, E., Vercaemst, V., De Busschere, A., Baudonck, M., & Vanhaeke, J. (2019). Metacognition and motivation as predictors for mathematics performance of Belgian elementary school children. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01020-w

q3 · i? · associational · r?

Comparison of poor versus well-performing children in the longitudinal Belgian sample across all grades. The abstract reports poor performers "overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers" and are less motivated and metacognitively accurate; no effect size is printed.

"we observed that poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, and less metacognitively accurate. Moreover, they overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id poor-math-performers-overestimate-and-less-motivated
title Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, less metacognitively accurate, and overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades
description Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, less metacognitively accurate, and overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — desoete-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.