Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, less metacognitively accurate, and overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated and less metacognitively accurate than well-performing peers. → Desoete 2019
q3 i? Poor mathematics performers overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades. → Desoete 2019
Evidence¶
Desoete 2019¶
Desoete, A., Baten, E., Vercaemst, V., De Busschere, A., Baudonck, M., & Vanhaeke, J. (2019). Metacognition and motivation as predictors for mathematics performance of Belgian elementary school children. ZDM Mathematics Education, 51, 667–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-01020-w
q3 · i? · associational · r?
Comparison of poor versus well-performing children in the longitudinal Belgian sample across all grades. The abstract reports poor performers "overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers" and are less motivated and metacognitively accurate; no effect size is printed.
"we observed that poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, and less metacognitively accurate. Moreover, they overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Motivation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Intrinsic motivation was related to mathematical accuracy but not to fluency in Grade 3 — related
- Self Assessment Accuracy Is Low Without Training — related
- A theoretical article, citing two simulation studies, reports that novice clinical learners overestimated their performance and that their confidence exceeded their accuracy — related
- Self-determination theory holds that autonomy support raises intrinsic motivation, and a meta-analysis finds expected tangible rewards undermine it — related
- Metacognitive postdiction skills are related to mathematical accuracy throughout the whole elementary school period (Grades 1–6) — related
- At low memory loads, older adults report less uncertainty than younger adults despite making larger errors, suggesting an overconfidence bias — related
- Cognitive modeling raised division skill more than didactic instruction while both raised self-efficacy equally, with self-efficacy mediating treatment effects — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
poor-math-performers-overestimate-and-less-motivated |
title |
Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, less metacognitively accurate, and overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades |
description |
Poor mathematics performers are less intrinsically motivated, less metacognitively accurate, and overestimate their performances more often than well-performing peers in all grades |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — desoete-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.