PoorAF and control children do not differ in error rates on the multiplication task, indicating the problems were not too difficult¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The group effect on error rates was not significant and did not interact with task; PoorAF children's multiplication error rates were low and comparable to controls. → Mussolin 2008

Evidence¶

Mussolin 2008¶

Mussolin, C. and Noël, M-P. (2008). Specific Retrieval Deficit from Long-Term Memory in Children with Poor Arithmetic Facts Abilities. The Open Psychology Journal. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350100801010026

q3 · i? · associational · r2

A mixed ANCOVA on error rates with group as between-subjects factor, task as within-subjects factor, and LUM scores as covariate. The main effect of task was significant (F(5, 165) = 12.142, p < .001), but the group effect was not significant and did not interact with task.

"The group effect was not significant ( F<1) and did not interact with the task ( p > .05)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• PoorAF children show a significant problem-size effect in multiplication RTs, with a marginally significant stronger problem-size influence than controls — related
• Children with poor arithmetic fact abilities are significantly slower than matched controls only on the multiplication selection task — related
• PoorAF children do not differ from controls on tasks retrieving semantic information (words, objects, countries) or verbal routines (proverbs) — related