Claims

Children with poorer oral communicative competence experience higher levels of peer rejection after controlling for gender, age, and SES

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a cross-sectional study of 447 Dutch children, oral communicative competence accounted for unique variance in peer rejection after controlling for gender, age, and SES. → Femke van der Wilt 2019

Evidence

Femke van der Wilt 2019

Femke van der Wilt, Chiel van der Veen, Claudia van Kruistum, Bert van Oers (2019). Why Do Children Become Rejected by Their Peers? A Review of Studies into the Relationship Between Oral Communicative Competence and Sociometric Status in Childhood. Educational Psychology Review (2019) 31:699–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09479-z

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports, from van der Wilt et al. (2018a) (N = 447 children aged 3.83–6.50, Nijmegen Test for Pragmatics, multiple regression analyses, cross-sectional design), that "oral communicative competence accounted for unique variance" in peer rejection. No effect size is printed.

"After controlling for gender, age, and SES, oral communicative competence accounted for unique variance: children with poorer oral communicative competence experienced higher levels of peer rejection."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id poorer-communicative-competence-higher-peer-rejection
title Children with poorer oral communicative competence experience higher levels of peer rejection after controlling for gender, age, and SES
description Children with poorer oral communicative competence experience higher levels of peer rejection after controlling for gender, age, and SES
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — femke-van-der-wilt-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.