Claims

The relation between oral communicative competence and sociometric status is expected to be interactional and transactional rather than unidirectional

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? The authors argue the relation is unlikely to go one way; the two components are expected to be mutually strengthening and to continue influencing each other. → Femke van der Wilt 2019

Evidence

Femke van der Wilt 2019

Femke van der Wilt, Chiel van der Veen, Claudia van Kruistum, Bert van Oers (2019). Why Do Children Become Rejected by Their Peers? A Review of Studies into the Relationship Between Oral Communicative Competence and Sociometric Status in Childhood. Educational Psychology Review (2019) 31:699–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09479-z

q1 · i? · review · r3

Authors' interpretation, attributed to Parker et al. (2006): because antecedents and consequents of problematic peer relationships are extremely complex, neither direction alone is correct. This is a theoretical expectation, not a tested result; the review states there is still insufficient empirical evidence to answer the direction question.

"It is, instead, expected that they are linked in an interactional and transactional manner in which both components are mutually strengthening and continue to influence each other"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id transactional-competence-sociometric-relation
title The relation between oral communicative competence and sociometric status is expected to be interactional and transactional rather than unidirectional
description The relation between oral communicative competence and sociometric status is expected to be interactional and transactional rather than unidirectional
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — femke-van-der-wilt-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.