Claims

Students taught map sketching and location with portfolio assessment showed significantly higher post-test Geography Achievement Test scores than their own pre-test scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's post-test mean (M=45.65; SD=12.86) was significantly higher than its pre-test mean (M=12.33; SD=6.55), t(48) = -20.24, p < 0.05. → Ugodulunwa 2015

Evidence

Ugodulunwa 2015

Ugodulunwa, C., & Wakjissa, S. (2015). Use of Portfolio Assessment Technique in Teaching Map Sketching and Location in Secondary School Geography in Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(17). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079911

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experimental study of 49 students in one school taught map sketching and location with portfolio assessment for 12 weeks; t-test for dependent samples on Geography Achievement Test scores. The article reports "t (48) = -20.24, p < 0.05"; no effect size is printed.

"The mean performance of experimental group on the p ost-test (M=45.65; SD=12.86) was significantly high er than their mean performance on pre-test (M=12.33; S D= 6.55); t (48) = -20.24, p < 0.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.