Claims

Among students taught with portfolio assessment, post-test geography performance did not differ significantly by gender

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? No significant difference was found between post-test mean scores of males (M=47.33; SD=10.68) and females (M=44.72; SD=11.43) in the experimental group, p > .05. → Ugodulunwa 2015

Evidence

Ugodulunwa 2015

Ugodulunwa, C., & Wakjissa, S. (2015). Use of Portfolio Assessment Technique in Teaching Map Sketching and Location in Secondary School Geography in Jos, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(17). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1079911

q2 · i? · causal · r2

t-test for independent samples on post-test Geography Achievement Test scores of 19 male and 30 female students in the portfolio-assessment group. The article reports a non-significant difference at the .05 level; no effect size is printed, so equivalence was not tested.

"Table 3 reveals that no significant difference exi sts between the post-test geography means scores of males (M=47.33; SD=10.68) and females (M=44.72; SD= 11.43); t (48) = 12.32, p>.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.