Claims

Students taught with concept mapping expressed a positive attitude toward concept mapping on a 14-item Likert questionnaire

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Questionnaire responses from the experimental group showed positive attitudes, including enjoyment of constructing concept maps and willingness to use concept maps for revising other physics topics. → Luchembe et al. 2014

Evidence

Luchembe et al. 2014

Dennis Luchembe, Kaumba Chinyama, Jack Jumbe. (2014). The Effect of Using Concept Mapping on Student's Attitude and Achievement When Learning the Physics Topic of Circular and Rotational Motion. European J of Physics Education, Volume 5 Issue 4. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068159

q2 · i? · causal · r2

A 14-item five-point Likert questionnaire administered to the 35 experimental-group students immediately after the post-test measured attitude toward concept mapping. The authors report that "students had a positive attitude towards the use of concept mapping"; for example, on relating new information to prior knowledge, 12 strongly agreed, 16 agreed and 7 were neutral, with no disagreement.

"Generally, these results indicated that students had a positive attitude towards the use of concept mapping."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.