Claims

Participants expressed overall agreement (positive attitudes) towards using e-Mind Maps in teaching the English curriculum, with a general mean of 2.15 out of 3.00

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Descriptive analysis of the attitude scale responses showed general agreement, with item means ranging from 1.67 to 2.67 on the triple scale. → Afaf M. Aljaser 2017

Evidence

Afaf M. Aljaser 2017

Afaf M. Aljaser. (2017). The Effectiveness of Electronic Mind Maps in Developing Academic Achievement and the Attitude towards Learning English among Primary School Students. International Education Studies, Vol. 10, No. 12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n12p80

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of frequencies, percentages, means and standard deviations of the 15 experimental-group students' responses to the 33-item attitude scale. The general mean was "an arithmetic mean 2.15 out of 3.00", ranked as agreement; the top-ranked item was that English is important compared to other subjects (mean 2.67).

"the agreement of the participants to “using e-Mind Maps in teaching the curriculum of English” achieved an arithmetic mean 2.15 out of 3.00, wh ich was ranked second on the triple scale 1.67 out of 2.33, indicating “agreement” on the study’s tool."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.