Claims

Iranian EFL learners in the flipped group held mostly positive attitudes toward flipped instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On a 22-item five-point Likert questionnaire, directional-item means ranged from 3.60 to 4.20, indicating agreement that flipped instruction was helpful. → Karimi and Hamzavi 2017

Evidence

Karimi and Hamzavi 2017

Mehrnoosh Karimi, Raouf Hamzavi. (2017). The Effect of Flipped Model of Instruction on EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension: Learners' Attitudes in Focus. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.1p.95

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Frequency analysis of a 22-item Likert questionnaire (adapted from Elfatah and Ahmed, 2016; Cronbach alpha 0.91) completed by the 25 experimental-group learners. Descriptive means only; no inferential test of attitudes is reported.

"the means of the questionnaire's directional items ranged from 3.60 to 4.20 which indicates that most of the EFL students had positive attitude towards flipped model of instruction"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.