Claims

Treatment-group pre-service teachers held positive attitudes toward peer instruction, with questionnaire item means ranging from 3.4000 to 4.5500

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All 26 attitude items scored above the neutral midpoint (total M = 4.258), with the highest means for creating a supportive classroom environment (M = 4.5500) and intention to use peer instruction in future teaching (M = 4.5250). → Al-Hebaishi 2017

Evidence

Al-Hebaishi 2017

Safaa Mohammad Al-Hebaishi. (2017). The Effect of Peer Instruction Method on Pre-Service Teachers' Conceptual Comprehension of Methodology Course. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p70

q2 · i? · causal · r2

26-item five-point Likert questionnaire administered to the treatment group (N = 41) at semester's end; Cronbach's alpha was .950. Item means ranged "between 4.5500- and 3.4000" with a total mean of 4.258; 92% agreed peer instruction created a supportive environment.

"The results of the questionnai re's analysis revealed high mean scores ranging between 4.5500- and 3.4000."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.