Claims

Positive emotion expressions in discussion messages positively correlate with project grades

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Among LIWC variables, only positive emotion was positively correlated with the project grade (r = .16, p < .01). → Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim 2014

Evidence

Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim 2014

Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim. (2014). Can Online Discussion Participation Predict Group Project Performance? Investigating the Roles of Linguistic Features and Participation Patterns. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0010-8

q2 · i1 · associational · r2

Correlation analysis (N = 173 groups, Table 7) reporting positive emotion at r = .16; the regression retained it with Beta = .13 (p < .05). The authors interpret that "Information providers may present positive attitudes and praise others more often than others."

"Among LIWC variables, only positive emotion was positively correlated with the project grade. Information providers may present positive attitudes and praise others more often than others."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.