Groups that provide more information to others (Source role) achieve higher project grades¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i2 The Source (information providing) role shows a significant positive correlation with project grade (r = .22, p < .01) and the largest regression coefficient B = .47 (p < .001). → Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim 2014

Evidence¶

Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim 2014¶

Jaebong Yoo & Jihie Kim. (2014). Can Online Discussion Participation Predict Group Project Performance? Investigating the Roles of Linguistic Features and Participation Patterns. Int J Artif Intell Educ. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-013-0010-8

q2 · i2 · associational · r2

Correlation and multiple regression analyses of eight semesters of discussion data (N = 173 groups). Table 7 reports Source correlating r = .22 with grade; the regression table reports "B = .47 (p < .001)" as the largest coefficient of the retained predictors.

"Source has the largest regression coefficient, B = .47 (p < .001) and a significant correlation with the project grade. That is, the more information the group provides to other groups, the better grade they achieve."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Earlier participation relative to project deadlines (higher APTTD) predicts higher project grades — related
• Positive emotion expressions in discussion messages positively correlate with project grades — related
• A three-predictor regression model (Source, APTTD, positive emotion) explains 32% of variance in group project grades — related
• Online discussion participation predicted team project grades: students who answered others' questions more frequently and had a positive attitude received better grades — related