Claims

The average student demonstrated positive math and reading gains during the 2020-2021 school year

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Despite pandemic disruptions, average growth in both math and reading was positive during the 2020-2021 school year. → Megan Kuhfeld 2022

Evidence

Megan Kuhfeld 2022

Megan Kuhfeld, James Soland, Karyn Lewis, Erik Ruzek, Angela Johnson. (2022). The COVID-19 school year: Learning and recovery across 2020-2021. AERA Open, 8. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221099306

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Trend modeling of test scores from 4.9 million U.S. students in Grades 3 through 8 found that "the average student demonstrated positive gains in math and reading during the 2020-2021 school year," yet spring 2021 achievement remained below prepandemic averages. No effect size is printed for the gains themselves.

"Although the average student demonstrated positive gains in math and reading during the 2020-2021 school year, students were still behind typical (prepandemic) averages by spring 2021"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id positive-gains-2020-2021-school-year
title The average student demonstrated positive math and reading gains during the 2020-2021 school year
description The average student demonstrated positive math and reading gains during the 2020-2021 school year
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — megan-kuhfeld-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.