Claims

Ghanaian pre-service science teachers hold significantly positive performance expectancy and effort expectancy toward AI

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All performance expectancy items scored above the neutral midpoint (e.g., M = 4.04, SD = .933 for improving lesson quality) and were significantly higher than the midpoint (p < .001). → Amponsah 2026 q2 i? All effort expectancy items scored above the midpoint (e.g., M = 3.89, SD = .994 for ease of learning and use), with the lowest item on required effort (M = 3.52, SD = 1.094). → Amponsah 2026 (2)

Evidence

Amponsah 2026

Amponsah, K. D., Adu-Boahen, J., Commey-Mintah, P., Kumassah, E. K., Ayittey, R. F., Nketsiah, J. (2026). Perceptions And Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Science Education Programmes: Voices of Pre-Service Science Teachers. Education Quarterly Reviews, 9(3), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.09.03.724

q2 · i? · associational · r2

One-sample t-tests on performance expectancy items in the survey of 380 pre-service science teachers; Table 2 reports means from 3.80 to 4.13, all above the midpoint of 3.0, with p < .001 for every item.

"One-sample t-test results revealed that all these mean scores were significantly higher than the neutral midpoint, as indicated by statistically significant t-values (p < .001), suggesting that teachers' positive perceptions of AI are not due to chance but represent a meaningful trend in the sample."

Amponsah 2026 (2)

Amponsah, K. D., Adu-Boahen, J., Commey-Mintah, P., Kumassah, E. K., Ayittey, R. F., Nketsiah, J. (2026). Perceptions And Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence in Science Education Programmes: Voices of Pre-Service Science Teachers. Education Quarterly Reviews, 9(3), 51-65. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.09.03.724

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Table 3 reports effort expectancy means from 3.52 to 3.90, all significantly above the midpoint (p < .001). The article notes "some reservations about the effort involved" on the lowest-scoring item.

"The results for effort expectancy indicate that teachers generally perceive AI applications as easy to use and integrate into science teaching."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id positive-performance-effort-expectancy-ai-pre-service-teachers
title Ghanaian pre-service science teachers hold significantly positive performance expectancy and effort expectancy toward AI
description Ghanaian pre-service science teachers hold significantly positive performance expectancy and effort expectancy toward AI
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — amponsah-2026, amponsah-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.