The experimental group's posttest mean (75.71) exceeded the control group's (63.72) after treatment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group's mean posttest score of 75.71 was higher than the control group's mean posttest score of 63.72. → Mutmainah 2019
Evidence¶
Mutmainah 2019¶
Mutmainah, Rukayah, Mintasih Indriayu. (2019). Effectiveness of experiential learning-based teaching material in Mathematics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2019, pp. 57-63. http://iaescore.com/journals/index.php/IJERE
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive comparison of posttest means in the quasi-experiment: the experimental group using experiential learning-based material averaged "75.71" versus "63.72" for the control group using common teaching material. These are descriptive means; no effect size is printed.
"The mean of posttest score in experimental group is 75.71, while the mean of the posttest score in control group is 63.72. It indicates that the cognitive ability of the experimental group is better than the control group."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both groups improved from pretest to posttest, with most experimental students passing the KKM threshold of 60 — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.