Both groups improved from pretest to posttest, with most experimental students passing the KKM threshold of 60¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experimental group's average rose from 44.29 to 75.71 and the control group's from 42.95 to 63.72; most experimental students passed the KKM of 60 while several control students did not. → Mutmainah 2019

Evidence¶

Mutmainah 2019¶

Mutmainah, Rukayah, Mintasih Indriayu. (2019). Effectiveness of experiential learning-based teaching material in Mathematics. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), Vol. 8, No. 1, March 2019, pp. 57-63. http://iaescore.com/journals/index.php/IJERE

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest-posttest descriptive results in the quasi-experiment: experimental averages improved from "44.29" to "75.71" and control from "42.95" to "63.72". The article also reports most experimental students passed the KKM of 60 while several control students did not.

"The pretest average score of the experimental group is 44.29 and the posttest score is improved to 75.71. Meanwhile, the pretest average score of the control group is 42.95 and the posttest score is improved to 63.72."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The experimental group's posttest mean (75.71) exceeded the control group's (63.72) after treatment — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• The TGT group scored higher than the lecture-based control group on the mathematics posttest, a difference the authors call significant though they print only within-group pretest-posttest tests — related
• Experimental (ABSI) group's achievement scores increased significantly from pre-test to post-test, while the control group's did not — related