Teachers described an ideal technology coach as prepared, patient, observant, and using current research-based methods¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Case study teachers reported prior coaches were unprepared and used outdated methods, creating reluctance to engage in coaching, and described an ideal coach with specific characteristics including patience, preparation, class observation, step-by-step guidance, and current research-based methods. → Carol Lopez 2021
Evidence¶
Carol Lopez 2021¶
Carol Lopez, Odelia Younge. (2021). Creating Conditions for Powerful Technology Use: Teachers' Technology Journey in Puerto Rico. Digital Promise. https://digitalpromise.dspacedirect.org/items/bcbf5887-7cf2-48be-b776-c19cb5ef979f
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Focus group discussions found consensus that coaching could be improved: prior "coaches were not prepared for the role and lacked the knowledge and teaching experiences necessary to understand classroom dynamics and technology challenges," and teachers described the ideal coaching experience quoted here.
"an ideal coaching experience would include a coach who is patient, available, prepared, spends enough time with the educator, is punctual, observes their classes, reviews their plans, provides step-by-step guidance, shares feedback, communicates consistently, and uses current research-based teaching methods."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- About one-third of edtech coaches felt unprepared at closure onset to support non-digital-instruction needs such as social-emotional support and equitable lessons — related
- Dynamic Learning Project research found teachers who worked with edtech coaches used technology more frequently and felt more confident than peers who did not — related
- Pilot participants earned micro-credentials aligned to their coaching challenges, and a school leader described micro-credentials as a strategy for increasing teachers' professional development — related
- Coaching is more effective when support is personalized to teachers' needs and classroom contexts — related
- Well-prepared and well-mentored teachers stay in teaching at more than twice the rate of unprepared entrants, and teacher residency programs typically retain more than 80% over five years — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pr-ideal-coach-characteristics-teacher-voice |
title |
Teachers described an ideal technology coach as prepared, patient, observant, and using current research-based methods |
description |
Teachers described an ideal technology coach as prepared, patient, observant, and using current research-based methods |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — carol-lopez-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.