Claims

Practical life materials introduced into conventional kindergartens improve children's fine motor control relative to conventional materials

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After 6 months, kindergarten classes given more than 50 practical life exercises scored higher on the penny posting test than comparison classes, despite equivalent time on fine-motor activities. → Chloë Marshall 2017

Evidence

Chloë Marshall 2017

Chloë Marshall. (2017). Montessori education: a review of the evidence base. npj Science of Learning 2:11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-017-0012-7

q2 · i? · review · r3

Quasi-experimental study in eight conventional kindergarten classes given practical life exercises versus five comparison classes, measured with the penny posting test. Teachers reported both groups spent the same time on fine-motor tasks, and no other Montessori elements were introduced, so the effect was attributed to the materials themselves.

"At pre-test the treatment and comparison groups did not differ in the number of pennies posted, but at posttest 6 months later the treatment group achieved a higher score than the comparison group, indicating finer motor control"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.