Claims

Practice between or during film demonstrations did not aid perceptual-motor learning

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 1955 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Permitting individuals to practice a perceptual motor task between learning experiences did not prove to be an aid to learning, and concurrent practice was not found to be an aid. → RESEARCH ABSTRACTS 163 1955

Evidence

RESEARCH ABSTRACTS 163 1955

RESEARCH ABSTRACTS 163. (1955). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=NONE

q3 · i? · causal · r?

From the film repetition experiments; the abstract reports neither practice between demonstrations nor concurrent practice aided learning of the perceptual-motor knot-tying task.

"Permitting individuals to prac- tice a perceptual motor task between learning experiences did not prove to be an aid to learning. Concurrent practice was not found to be an aid to learning."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id practice-during-film-demonstrations-no-aid
title Practice between or during film demonstrations did not aid perceptual-motor learning
description Practice between or during film demonstrations did not aid perceptual-motor learning
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 1955
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — research-abstracts-163-1955

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.