Practice with feedback, regardless of feedback type, improves metacognitive calibration relative to lecture, reducing overconfidence by about 13 percentage points¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Study 2, both practice conditions showed prediction errors about 13 points lower than lecture, which overestimated performance by 26 percentage points; the practice conditions did not differ. → Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho 2026
Evidence¶
Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho 2026¶
Michael W. Asher & Paulo F. Carvalho. (2026). Conditions for Effective Learning Without Upfront Instruction: How Practice with Feedback Supports Memory, Generalization, Motivation, and Metacognition. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10103-6
q3 · i? · causal · r3
Study 2 measured calibration by the difference between actual and predicted posttest scores before the test. Lecture participants overestimated performance "by 26 percentage points"; "average prediction errors were 13 points lower in the explanatory feedback condition" and 13.6 points lower with correct-response feedback; the practice conditions did not differ (p =.912).
"Compared to lecture, average prediction errors were 13 points lower in the explanatory feedback condition, t(294) = 2.69, p =.008, and 13.6 points lower in the correct-response feedback condition, t(294) = 2.77, p =.006."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learners judge explanatory feedback as more effective preparation than correct-response feedback, in both studies — related
- In one 2×2 experiment with 120 undergraduates, an Assessment-Performance Calibration Activity (APCA) gave the most accurate self-assessment and least overconfidence, and adding a feedback-literacy script did not improve calibration further — related
- Full reasoning traces worsened calibration bias and Brier scores relative to both other conditions — related
- Children's ability to discriminate between correct and incorrect answers did not change over training regardless of group — related
- Practice with feedback—either correct-answer or explanatory—produces better memory than lecture, in both multiple-choice and open-ended formats — related
- Without feedback, more practice-test participation predicts lower specificity (worse detection of incorrect answers); with corrective feedback this negative relation disappears — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
practice-feedback-improves-metacognitive-calibration |
title |
Practice with feedback, regardless of feedback type, improves metacognitive calibration relative to lecture, reducing overconfidence by about 13 percentage points |
description |
Practice with feedback, regardless of feedback type, improves metacognitive calibration relative to lecture, reducing overconfidence by about 13 percentage points |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — michael-w-asher-paulo-f-carvalho-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.