Claims

Both groups improved from pre-test to post-test on both topic tests, with the experimental group's Test 2 post-test mean exceeding the control group's

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test mean marks improved over pre-test means for both groups on Test 1 and Test 2; in Test 2 the experimental group's post-test mean (26.0±2.0 of 44) exceeded the control group's (24.0±3.1). → Eldy 2019

Evidence

Eldy 2019

Eldy, E.F., Chang, J.H.W., Butai, S.N., Basri, N.F., Awang. H., Din, W.A., & Arshad, S.E. (2019). Inverted classroom improves pre-university students understanding on basic topic of physics: The preliminary study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(3), 420-427. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.599

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive box-plot and mean comparison (Figure 3) of pre- and post-test marks for control and experimental groups on both tests; these are descriptive means with no test statistic attached in this sentence.

"Slightly better improvement is observed in Test 2 where control group scored a mean of 16.6±7.3 marks in pre-test and 24.0±3.1 marks in post-test; experimental group scored a mean of 16.1±6.6 in pre-test and 26.0±2.0 in post-test."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.