Claims

Students taught with intensive practical activities gained far more from pre-test to post-test (mean gain 26.0) than conventionally taught students (mean gain 2.8)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The experimental group's mean gain of 26.0 exceeded the control group's 2.8 between the end-of-term-one pre-test and the post-test. → Musasia 2016

Evidence

Musasia 2016

Musasia, A. M., Ocholla, A. A., & Sakwa, T. W. (2016). Physics Practical Work and Its Influence on Students' Academic Achievement. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(28). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1118591

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Comparison of pre-test (EOTOFTE) and post-test (PTCT) mean scores for the whole sample: experimental means rose from 27.0 to 53.0 while control means rose from 26.7 to 29.5, giving the reported "higher mean gain of 26.0 compared to 2.8".

"The post test results show that experimental group perf ormed better than their counterpart control group b y having a higher mean gain of 26.0 compared to 2.8 respective ly."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.