Pre-service teachers struggle with instructional design and lesson planning despite existing standards and coursework¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2030: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Prior Thai studies and the authors' own qualitative data indicate pre-service teachers encounter difficulties in lesson plan writing, designing engaging activities, sequencing instructional steps, and selecting appropriate methods and media. → Khaewphuang 2025
Evidence¶
Khaewphuang 2025¶
Khaewphuang, P., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2025). Components and Indicators of Instructional Design Competence for Thai Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(2), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v6i2.97
q1 · i? · associational · r2
The article cites prior Thai studies (Pornviriyasakul 2011; Chaowakiratipong 2017; Kerdnate & Phueadchantheuk 2020) and the authors' own interviews and lesson-plan analyses from second-year pre-service teachers, reporting difficulties in designing engaging activities and writing lesson plans.
"Pornviriyasakul (2011) found that during their teaching practicum, pre-service teachers encountered difficulties in instructional design, lesson plan writing, devising engaging learning activities, and sequencing instructional steps."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The three-dimension instructional design competence model fits the empirical data acceptably in CFA — related
- Ability in instructional design carries the highest second-order factor loading, followed by knowledge and personal attributes — related
- Instructional design competence of pre-service teachers comprises knowledge, ability, and personal attributes dimensions — related
- Pre-service teachers choose strategies, methods, and techniques mainly for fit with objective content and for promoting active student participation — related
- Many students in the digital-images inquiry found identifying engineering tradeoffs difficult despite the budget constraint design — related
- Teachers pose inquiry questions mostly about their students, not their own teaching, indicating teaching data remains a novel concept — related
- Teachers in the formative study agreed lesson plans need adjustment when student ability diverges, with STEM subjects more amenable to difficulty scaling than humanities subjects — related
- Higher education students struggle to identify appropriate data representations for AI model training — related
- A formative study with six teachers and two experts identified five core challenges in lesson plan adaptation, including lack of systematic student profile data and fragmented refinement workflows — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
pre-service-teachers-struggle-lesson-design |
title |
Pre-service teachers struggle with instructional design and lesson planning despite existing standards and coursework |
description |
Pre-service teachers struggle with instructional design and lesson planning despite existing standards and coursework |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
recheck_by |
2030 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — khaewphuang-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.