Predictability benefits accuracy increase when responses occur close to the onset of the next target (Interval × Predictability interaction)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Hit rate showed a two-way interaction of Response-Onset Interval and Predictability, with predictability influencing behaviour when responses were close to the next target onset. → Nir Shalev 2024

Evidence¶

Nir Shalev 2024¶

Nir Shalev, Sage Boettcher & Anna C. Nobre. (2024). Spatiotemporal predictions guide attention throughout the adult lifespan. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00281-3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Same GLMM analysis of hit rate. The interaction " β = −0.01; SE = 0.03; z = −2.9; p = 0.003" was probed with estimated marginal means; "when responses were closer to or exceeded the onset of the next target, observers of all ages were more likely to select a predictable target".

"alongside a two-way interaction of Interval and Predictability ( β = −0.01; SE = 0.03; z = −2.9; p = 0.003)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The accuracy benefit of spatiotemporal predictions does not interact with age across the adult lifespan — related
• Predictable targets are detected at higher hit rates than unpredictable targets in dynamic visual search across adulthood — related