Claims

The accuracy benefit of spatiotemporal predictions does not interact with age across the adult lifespan

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Age did not interact with Predictability on hit rate, indicating prediction-led detection gains remained resistant to aging. → Nir Shalev 2024

Evidence

Nir Shalev 2024

Nir Shalev, Sage Boettcher & Anna C. Nobre. (2024). Spatiotemporal predictions guide attention throughout the adult lifespan. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00281-3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

GLMM hit-rate analysis in the online dynamic search task (N = 300). The article reports that "Age did not interact with Predictability (p = 0.14)", and the three-way Age × Interval × Predictability interaction was also not significant. Equivalence was not tested; only the absence of a detected interaction is reported.

"Age did not interact with Predictability (p = 0.14) or Response-Target Interval (p = 0.67). The three-way interaction among all factors was also not significant (p = 0.058)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id accuracy-prediction-benefit-preserved-with-age
title The accuracy benefit of spatiotemporal predictions does not interact with age across the adult lifespan
description The accuracy benefit of spatiotemporal predictions does not interact with age across the adult lifespan
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — nir-shalev-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.