Lower creative achievements, higher creative self-efficacy, and higher task motivation predict more positive bias in self-assessed creative performance¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the final regression model, more positive bias in self-assessed creative performance was predicted by low creative achievements, high creative self-efficacy, and high task motivation. → Lebuda 2025

Evidence¶

Lebuda 2025¶

Lebuda, I., Hofer, G., & Benedek, M. (2025). Determinants of creative metacognitive monitoring: creativity, personality, and task-related predictors of self-assessed ideas and creative performance. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09432-2

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Hierarchical multiple regression (N = 425) predicting bias in self-assessed creative performance, with real-life creativity, core personality, surface personality, and task-related factors entered in steps; the final model retained achievements (negative), self-efficacy, and motivation.

"more positive bias in self-assessed creative performance was predicted by low creative achievements, high creative self-efficacy, and high task motivation;"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Higher narcissism and higher task motivation predict more positive bias in self-assessed idea creativity
• Higher narcissism and task motivation predict more positive self-assessed idea creativity
• Higher divergent thinking, creative self-efficacy, creative self-concept, and task motivation predict more positive self-assessed creative performance — related
• Self-assessed creative performance and self-assessed idea creativity are moderately correlated but empirically distinct judgments — related
• Individual factors supportive of adolescent creativity include openness to experience, intrinsic motivation, creative self-efficacy, and external attributions for adversity — related