Claims

Higher narcissism and higher task motivation predict more positive bias in self-assessed idea creativity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the final regression model, more positive bias in self-assessed idea creativity was predicted by high narcissism and high task motivation. → Lebuda 2025

Evidence

Lebuda 2025

Lebuda, I., Hofer, G., & Benedek, M. (2025). Determinants of creative metacognitive monitoring: creativity, personality, and task-related predictors of self-assessed ideas and creative performance. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09432-2

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Hierarchical multiple regression (N = 425) predicting bias in self-assessed idea creativity; real-life creativity explained significant variance in the first step and later steps added significantly, with narcissism and motivation retained in the final model.

"more positive bias in self-assessed idea creativity was predicted by high narcissism and high task motivation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id narcissism-motivation-predict-idea-bias
title Higher narcissism and higher task motivation predict more positive bias in self-assessed idea creativity
description Higher narcissism and higher task motivation predict more positive bias in self-assessed idea creativity
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lebuda-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.