Claims

The pre-test covariate had no statistically significant effect on post-test concept acquisition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ANCOVA showed no statistically significant differences at the 0.05 level for the pre-test variable (F = 0.331, significance 0.567). → Hamadneh 2017

Evidence

Hamadneh 2017

Dr. Qaseem Mohammad Salim Hamadneh. (2017). The Effect of Using Jigsaw Strategy in Teaching Science on the Acquisition of Scientific Concepts Among the Fourth Graders of Bani Kinana Directorate of Education. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.8, No.5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133045

q2 · i? · causal · r1

In the same ANCOVA of the 70-student semi-experimental study, the pre-test entered as a companion variable was non-significant; the printed effect size (Eta) was 0.005 with F = 0.331 and significance 0.567.

"there were no statistically significant differences at the level of (0.05) for the pre-test where the value of (F) w as (0.331) by a statistical significance of (0.567)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.