Pretest and posttest scores correlated significantly (r=0.21, p<0.05), justifying the pretest covariate¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 The correlation between pretest and posttest was significant, r=0.21, p<0.05. → Mosley 2016
Evidence¶
Mosley 2016¶
Mosley, P., Ardito, G., & Scollins, L. (2016). Robotic Cooperative Learning Promotes Student STEM Interest. American Journal of Engineering Education, 7(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1131333
q2 · i2 · causal · r1
Correlational analysis of the study's own pretest and posttest administrations, used to justify ANCOVA: "the pretest was used as a single covariate in a simple ANCOVA analysis". The printed correlation is r=0.21, p<0.05.
"The correlation between the pretest and the posttest was significant (r=0.21, p<0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Pretest scores significantly predicted posttest scores, supporting the pretest as an ANCOVA covariate in this study — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Pretest performance and average math grade correlate with conceptual knowledge but not procedural knowledge posttest scores — related
- GPA, pretest score, and self-generated elaboration jointly predict intellectual skills but not procedural knowledge or attitudes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.