Claims

At pre-test the control group scored significantly higher than the experimental group on overall SUSSI and on the scientific theories and laws and social and cultural embeddedness aspects

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2019: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pre-test overall SUSSI means differed significantly in favor of the control group. → Ayşe Sert Çıbık 2016 q2 i? Pre-test differences on the scientific theories and laws and social and cultural embeddedness aspects favored the control group. → Ayşe Sert Çıbık 2016 (2)

Evidence

Ayşe Sert Çıbık 2016

Ayşe Sert Çıbık. (2016). The Effect of Project-Based History and Nature of Science Practices on the Change of Nature of Scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(4), 453-472. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094587

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent samples t-test of pre-test SUSSI scores in the quasi-experimental study; the control group mean of 84.98 was significantly higher. No effect size is printed.

"It is clear from the mean scores of the overall questionnaire that the mean score of the control group is higher than the experimental group’s score. Therefore, one can conclude that there is a significant difference in favor of the control group [ 𝑋̅ (control)=84.98]."

Ayşe Sert Çıbık 2016 (2)

Ayşe Sert Çıbık. (2016). The Effect of Project-Based History and Nature of Science Practices on the Change of Nature of Scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(4), 453-472. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094587

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Aspect-level pre-test analysis from the same t-test comparison; significant differences on two named aspects favored the control group, with control means of 11.50 and 13.50 printed. No effect size is reported.

"When the SUSSI is evaluated in terms of the aspects, significant differences could be seen in the scores related to ‘scientific theories and laws’ and ‘social and cultural embeddedness’ and this difference is in favor of the control group [ 𝑋̅ (control)=11.50, 𝑋̅ (control)=13.50]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.