Claims

Growth mindset prior to training predicted post-training math skills in the training group but not in controls

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-26 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In cross-lagged panel SEM, growth mindset before training predicted post-training WJ-III Math Fluency in the training group (β = 0.216, p = 0.025); this cross-lagged effect was not significant in controls (β = −0.219, p = 0.191). → Lang Chen 2022

Evidence

Lang Chen 2022

Lang Chen, Hyesang Chang, Jeremy Rudoler, Eydis Arnardottir, Yuan Zhang, Carlo de los Angeles and Vinod Menon. (2022). Cognitive training enhances growth mindset in children through plasticity of cortico-striatal circuits. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-022-00146-7

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Cross-lagged panel analysis using SEM on longitudinal pre- and post-training data. Model-fit comparison showed the constrained model "fit worse than the baseline model, χ2(1) = 4.433, p = 0.035", indicating the cross-lagged effect differed between groups.

"growth mindset prior to training was associated with post- training math skills in the training group, β = 0.216, p = 0.025, which suggests that higher levels of growth mindset lead to better math performance with training"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.