Primary school students show no awareness of their monitoring judgment accuracy before self-scoring in mathematics problem solving¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Before self-scoring, students' monitoring judgment accuracy did not significantly predict their confidence in that accuracy (SOJ-m) on either multiplication or division tasks, indicating no monitoring accuracy awareness. → Oudman 2024

Evidence¶

Oudman 2024¶

Oudman, S., van de Pol, J., Janssen, E., & van Gog, T. (2024). Primary school students' awareness of their monitoring and regulation judgment accuracy. Learning and Instruction, 92, 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101907

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Multilevel regression analysis (day, student, class levels) of data from 564 Dutch sixth-grade students (495 multiplication, 359 division) who completed parallel problem-solving tasks on two days. The main effect of monitoring accuracy on SOJ-m was not significant for either task, indicating students were "not aware of their monitoring judgment (in)accuracy before self-scoring."

"The main effect of students' monitoring judgment accuracy on their SOJ-m was not significant for either of the tasks (see M1 in Table 2), indicating that on average, students were not aware of their monitoring judgment (in)accuracy before self-scoring."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Task performance does not affect primary school students' monitoring accuracy awareness — related
• Students feel quite confident about their monitoring and regulation judgments even before self-scoring — related