Prior studies cited by the article also report that make a match improves student learning outcomes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The article cites Prihatmodjo et al. (2015) reporting post-test average 66.22 versus pre-test 46.25 after applying make a match, and similar results from Istiqomah (2010), Hidayah, Sunarno and Indriayu (2016) and Syaifullah (2016). → Arisanty 2019

Evidence¶

Arisanty 2019¶

Arisanty, D., Riyah. (2019). Application of make a match model to improve geography learning outcomes. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(1), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.547

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Narrative review of prior work attributed as the article attributes it: the article reports, citing Prihatmodjo et al. (2015), a post-test average of 66.22 versus a pre-test of 46.25, and cites Istiqomah (2010), Hidayah, Sunarno and Indriayu (2016) and Syaifullah (2016) for similar results. The cited studies' designs were not read.

"Prihatmodjo, et al. (2015) show that the make a match learning model can improve students learning outcomes characterized by an increase of geography learning outcomes."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Class X students taught geography principles with the make a match model scored higher on the post-test than students taught with the conventional model — related