Age-related component differences show proactive exploration lowest for youngest students¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The youngest age group (12 years) exhibited the lowest percentage of participants perceiving transversal skills, especially in proactive exploration (17%), while perceptions of certain skills tend to improve with age. → Okada 2024

Evidence¶

Okada 2024¶

Okada, A., Sherborne, T., Panselinas, G., & Kolionis, G. (2024). AI in Education: A Cross-National Study of Open Schooling Using the CARE-KNOW-DO Framework for Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3960164/v1

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Analysis of the age-comparison bar chart (Fig. 8); the article reports the youngest group's lowest score was "in proactive exploration (17%)" and that perceptions of certain skills tend to improve with age.

"The youngest age group (12) exhibited the lowest percentage of participants, especially in proactive exploration (17%), while the oldest group (17–18) had the highest majority of participants, apart from future prospects (67%)."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Age and Developmental Stage — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes

Related Claims¶

• Transversal-skill confidence increases with age in AI-based open schooling — related
• Adolescents showed faster, more accurate, and less variable performance than children, with reward effects on inhibition accuracy differing by age — related
• Pre-adolescent children already exhibit proactive inhibitory control, slowing responses as stop-signal probability increases — related
• Personal involvement with privacy topics increases with participant age, from 6.15 in the youngest secondary group to 8.65 in higher education — related