Claims

Problem-based developmental teaching methods used in engineering research work increased students' motivation levels

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Problem-based developmental teaching methods used while improving research work at the engineering university made it possible to increase student motivation. → Kozlo 2018

Evidence

Kozlo 2018

Kozlo, A. V., & Shemshurina, S. A. (2018). Fostering Creativity in Engineering Universities: Research Activity and Curriculum Policy. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 93-106. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1191553

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Test data from the pedagogical experiment, with the motivational component studied by questioning, are reported as showing that problem-based developmental teaching methods can "increase the level of motivation among students". No effect size or test statistic is printed.

"Test data have shown that problem -based developmental teaching methods used while improving the research w ork at the engineering university makes it possible to increase the level of motivation among students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.