Claims

Problem solving strategy is more effective than the scientific approach for students' mathematical creativity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught with problem solving strategy scored significantly higher in mathematical creativity than the scientific-approach group (t = 11.743, Sig. <0.025). → Tambunan 2019

Evidence

Tambunan 2019

Hardi Tambunan. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students' Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 293-302. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Same quasi-experimental design (n = 138 experimental, n = 139 control). Creativity posttest mean was 75.6087 for the experimental group versus 70.4460 for the control group; the t test rejected the null hypothesis.

"The results of the t test show that the value of t = 11.743, Sig. <0.025, the null hypothesis was rejected, and therefore, problem solving strategies are more effective than the scientific approach to students' abilities in mathematical creativity."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.