Sign priming effects in addition occur for large, small, and +1 problems but not for tie or +0 problems in older adults¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i2 For addition in older adults, presenting the sign before the operands significantly facilitated large (43 ms), small (55 ms), and +1 (34 ms) problems, but not tie (24 ms, p = .31) or +0 (25 ms, F < 1) problems. → Thevenot 2018
Evidence¶
Thevenot 2018¶
Thevenot, C., Dewi, J., Bagnoud, J., Wolfer, P., Fayol, M., & Castel, C. (2018). The use of automated procedures by older adults with high arithmetic skills during addition problem solving. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED
q3 · i2 · causal · r2
Planned comparisons in the older-adult sample of the sign priming experiment. Priming was significant for large, small, and +1 additions, whereas "tie problems (24 ms, F(1, 42) = 1.04, p = .31)" and +0 problems showed no significant facilitation.
"For addition in older adults, presenting the sign before the operands was facilitating for large problems (43 ms, F(1, 42) = 5.44, ηp2 = .11, p = .02), small problems (55 ms, F(1, 42) = 7.11, ηp2 = .15, p = .01) and problems involving 1 (34 ms, F(1, 42) = 17.19, ηp2 = .29, p < .001), but not for tie problems (24 ms, F(1, 42) = 1.04, p = .31) nor for problems involving 0 (25 ms, F(1, 42) < 1)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Bayesian analyses strongly support sign priming for small addition problems in older adults but only anecdotal support for +1 problems — related
- Older adults' slowdown relative to young adults is far smaller for problems interpreted as procedurally solved than for retrieval-solved problems — related
- Presenting the '+' sign 150 ms before operands speeds up addition problem solving in expert older adults, replicating the effect found in young adults — a broader claim this one bears on
- Problem type modulated solution times, with large problems slowest and +1 problems fastest in both age groups — related
- Previously identified effects in single digit multiplication, including the problem size effect and the tie effect, replicate in an integrated item-difficulty analysis. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
problem-type-priming-pattern-older |
title |
Sign priming effects in addition occur for large, small, and +1 problems but not for tie or +0 problems in older adults |
description |
Sign priming effects in addition occur for large, small, and +1 problems but not for tie or +0 problems in older adults |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — thevenot-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.