Procedural and strategic supports during reading tended to positively affect comprehension compared to no-treatment controls, with exceptions when compared against mobilization¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? When compared to control groups receiving no treatment, procedural and strategic supports during reading tended to positively affect comprehension and learning, per the review's synthesis. → Courtney Hattan 2023
q2 i? Exceptions occurred in comparisons against knowledge mobilization: benefits appeared for both perspective taking and mobilization in one study, and only for relational reasoning in another. → Courtney Hattan 2023 (2)
Evidence¶
Courtney Hattan 2023¶
Courtney Hattan, Patricia A. Alexander, and Sarah M. Lupo. (2023). Leveraging What Students Know to Make Sense of Texts: What the Research Says About Prior Knowledge Activation. Review of Educational Research. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Leveraging+What+Students+Know+to+Make+Sense+of+Texts+Prior+Knowledge+Activation
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review's synthesis across twelve articles in this category, which included teacher prompting, periodic questioning, written prompts, metacognitive support devices, conditional knowledge questionnaires, and perspective taking. The review hedges with tended to, citing multiple studies.
"When compared to a control group not receiving any treatment, these procedural and strategic supports tended to positively effect comprehension and learning"
Courtney Hattan 2023 (2)¶
Courtney Hattan, Patricia A. Alexander, and Sarah M. Lupo. (2023). Leveraging What Students Know to Make Sense of Texts: What the Research Says About Prior Knowledge Activation. Review of Educational Research. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Leveraging+What+Students+Know+to+Make+Sense+of+Texts+Prior+Knowledge+Activation
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports these two head-to-head comparisons as exceptions to the positive pattern, and also notes Carr and Thompson (1996) found both teacher prompting and spontaneous activation had positive results on readers' text comprehension.
"Two studies compared strategic or procedural supports to knowledge mobilization. Wetzels et al. (2011b) found benefits for both perspective taking and mobilization, while Hattan & Alexander (2021) only found benefits for relational reasoning."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Strategy Instruction Needs Conditional Knowledge — related
- Metacognitive strategy instruction, which includes comprehension monitoring, improves academic performance by a medium amount, and in one non-randomised study comprehension-monitoring training raised low achievers' reading scores — related
- Generating keywords after a delay increases relative judgment accuracy compared with no keyword generation, replicating the keyword effect with a new sample and new materials — related
- Disciplinary Literacy Instruction Improves Comprehension — related
- Effect sizes are higher against education-as-usual controls and lower against reading-treatment control conditions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
procedural-strategic-supports-tended-positive-versus-control |
title |
Procedural and strategic supports during reading tended to positively affect comprehension compared to no-treatment controls, with exceptions when compared against mobilization |
description |
Procedural and strategic supports during reading tended to positively affect comprehension compared to no-treatment controls, with exceptions when compared against mobilization |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-20 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — courtney-hattan-2023, courtney-hattan-2023-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.