Claims

Students taught with the Process Approach improved significantly from pre-test to post-test on all essay-writing variables

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The Experimental group's post-test scores were significantly higher than its pre-test scores on Content, Organization, Expression and Mechanical Accuracy (t-calculated 23.252, 18.010, 16.114, 13.472 > t-table 2.024). → Akinwamide 2012

Evidence

Akinwamide 2012

Akinwamide, T. K. (2012). The Influence of Process Approach on English as Second Language Students' Performances in Essay Writing. English Language Teaching, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n3p16

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired t-test comparison of pre-test and post-test scores for the 40 Experimental-group students on all four analytical variables. All t-calculated values exceeded t-table 2.024 at 0.05, so the within-group change was significant.

"Table 4 shows that t-calculated in each of the variables (23.252, 18.010, 16.114 and 13.472) is greater than t-table (2.024); hence the null hypothesis was rejected."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.