Claims

The control group showed no significant pre-test to post-test difference under conventional teaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? There is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre-test and post-test of the control group taught by conventional methods. → G. Singaravelu 2014

Evidence

G. Singaravelu 2014

G. Singaravelu. (2014). Efficacy of Multimedia Package in Communicative Skill in English. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, Vol. 4 No. 4, October - December. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068384

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental control condition (n = 42); Table 2 reports pre-test mean 9.43 (SD 3.80) and post-test mean 9.95 (SD 3.89), t = 0.15, null hypothesis accepted at the 0.05 level. Equivalence was not tested.

"In the Table 2, calculated t value (0.15) is lower than table value (1.96). The null-hypothesis is accepted at 0.05 level. It proves that there is no significant difference in achievement mean score between the pre test of control group and the post-test of control group"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.