Claims

Regulatory rules restricting which professionals may sign off students' skills objectives limit interprofessional mentoring opportunities

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Mentors identified existing rules on professional boundaries, such as nurses not being permitted to sign off skills objectives for medical students, as restricting interprofessional clinical practice. → Juntunen 2025

Evidence

Juntunen 2025

Juntunen, J., Tuomikoski, A.‐M., Pramila‐Savukoski, S., Kaarlela, V., Keinänen, A.‐L., Kääriäinen, M., & Mikkonen, K. (2025). Healthcare professionals' experiences of required competencies in mentoring of interprofessional students in clinical practice: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81, 701–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16347

q2 · i? · review · r3

A participant illustration quoted in the review from Missen et al. (2012): "nurses are currently not permitted to sign off skills objectives for medical students," exemplifying boundary rules limiting interprofessional practice.

"Nurses are often buddied with [to supervise] a medical student. However, nurses are currently not permitted to sign off skills objectives for medical students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.