Claims

Mentoring interprofessional students in clinical practice requires specific competencies that differ from profession-specific and individual mentoring

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? High-quality interprofessional mentoring requires specific competence that differs from profession-specific and individual mentoring. → Juntunen 2025

Evidence

Juntunen 2025

Juntunen, J., Tuomikoski, A.‐M., Pramila‐Savukoski, S., Kaarlela, V., Keinänen, A.‐L., Kääriäinen, M., & Mikkonen, K. (2025). Healthcare professionals' experiences of required competencies in mentoring of interprofessional students in clinical practice: A systematic review of qualitative studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81, 701–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.16347

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's own synthesis conclusion, drawn from meta-aggregation of 25 qualitative or mixed-methods studies of mentors' experiences, states that "High‐quality interprofessional mentoring requires specific competence that differs from profession‐specific and individual mentoring."

"Although competent mentors are essential to implementing and developing interprofessional clinical practice, some mentors find interprofessional mentoring challenging. High‐quality interprofessional mentoring requires specific competence that differs from profession‐specific and individual mentoring."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.