Claims

Project-method learners significantly outperformed control learners on the final test's reproduction-level questions

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the final knowledge test section measuring reproduction, the experimental group achieved significantly better results than the control group (p=0.000). → Prtljaga 2017

Evidence

Prtljaga 2017

Prtljaga, S. & Veselinov, D. (2017). The influence of the project method on the achievement of young learners in the field science and social studies. Research in Pedagogy, 7(2), 254-264. https://doi.org/10.17810/2015.63

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Covariance analysis of the final knowledge test's reproduction section (Table 2 reports group F= 58.394, p .000), controlling parents' educational level. The article reports "the experimental group achieved significantly better results" with no effect size printed.

"Therefore regarding the first level of questions – level of reproduction and recollection, on the basis of the results (Table 3) (p=0.000 on the level of significance of 0.05) it is noted that the experimental group achieved significantly better results."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.