Developers unanimously agreed Prompt Coach improved their prompt-writing skills and reported strong trust, personalization, and adoption readiness¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? All questionnaire parameters scored 5.67 to 6.33 on a 7-point scale; 100% agreement that PC improved prompt-writing skills, with significant one-sided Wilcoxon tests against the neutral midpoint after Holm-Bonferroni correction. → Rohit Mehra 2026

Evidence¶

Rohit Mehra 2026¶

Rohit Mehra, Kapil Singi, Vikrant Kaulgud, Vibhu Saujanya Sharma, Swapnajeet Gon Choudhury, Swati Sharma, Adam P. Burden, Majd Sakr. (2026). Prompt Coach: An Empirical Evaluation of an Agentic Tutor for Learning Prompt Engineering in Software Development. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.06074 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.06074

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Post-study 7-point Likert questionnaire from the same 15 developers (Table 3), tested with one-sample Wilcoxon signed-rank against the neutral midpoint with Holm-Bonferroni correction; all parameters significant (p < 0.05), means "5.67 to 6.33".

"Participants unanimously agreed that PC improved their code-generation prompt-writing skills (100% agreement), expressed strong trust in the guidance provided, and reported increased cognitive elaboration during prompt construction."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• NAMI On Campus Club participants reported high confidence in their clubs' impact, with 72–100% agreement across survey items — related
• Participants reported a strong level of agreement and high satisfaction with ideation discussion activities in Design Thinking — related