Claims

Propose is the dominant communication sequence in e-learning team design, occupying almost half of team activity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Propose communication sequences occupy 45.9% of total team activity, followed by call for attention (12.9%), explain (12.8%), and comment (10.8%). → Rapanta 2013

Evidence

Rapanta 2013

Rapanta, C., Maina, M., Lotz, N., & Bacchelli, A. (2013). Team design communication patterns in e-learning design and development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 581-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9306-5

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Frequency analysis of communication sequence codes in the same coded dataset. The article reports "propose" at "45.9%" of total team activity, with the next three sequences printed at 12.9, 12.8, and 10.8%.

"Regarding communication sequences, the predominance of “propose” is evident, occupying almost half of the total team activity (45.9%). The “call for attention,” “explain,” and “comment” sequences follow, with a frequency of 12.9, 12.8, and 10.8% correspondingly."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id propose-dominant-communication-sequence
title Propose is the dominant communication sequence in e-learning team design, occupying almost half of team activity
description Propose is the dominant communication sequence in e-learning team design, occupying almost half of team activity
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — rapanta-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.